Meeting Time Planner
Find the best time for meetings across different time zones.
Meeting Time Planner — Coordinate Across Time Zones & Schedules
Scheduling a meeting across multiple participants and time zones can be tricky. Our Meeting Time Planner helps you input each attendee’s availability (local time zone), then displays overlap windows and suggests best meeting slots—all automatically adjusted. Below you’ll find how it works, best practices, examples, and deeper details to build trust and clarity.
Why a Meeting Planner Tool Is Valuable
- Eliminates back-and-forth when coordinating schedules across time zones.
- Visualizes overlap windows making it easy to spot ideal meeting times.
- Handles daylight saving, local offset, and participant time zones behind the scenes.
- Supports scheduling fairness—ensuring no participant is forced to meet at unfavorable hours.
Many services (e.g. TimeAndDate’s Meeting Planner) support this kind of scheduling. Time And Date
Also, popular calendar tools like Google Calendar recently introduced built-in appointment scheduling features that simplify meeting selection. WIRED
How the Planner Works — Inputs & Logic
Here’s what the planner needs and how it operates:
Inputs from You / Participants:
- Time zone (or city) for each participant
- Available time windows (e.g. 09:00–12:00 local, 14:00–18:00 local)
- Meeting duration (e.g. 30 min, 1 hr)
- Date(s) or date range to consider
- Optionally buffer times (e.g. 15 min before/after)
Algorithm & Steps:
- Convert all availabilities to UTC (Normalized time basis)
- Overlay time windows to find intersections across participants
- Filter by meeting duration to see slots that fit length
- Adjust back into each participant’s local time for display
- Rank slots (e.g. minimize inconvenience: mid-day for all, earliest common window)
- Present recommended slots with local times for each person
Edge Handling:
- Daylight Saving Time changes
- Participants in opposite hemispheres or far offsets
- Overnight windows (e.g. someone available 23:00–02:00 local)
- Handling participants who cross the International Date Line
Examples & Use Cases
Example 1: Team Across Three Zones
| Participant | Time Zone | Availability (local) |
|---|---|---|
| Alice | New York (UTC−4) | 09:00–17:00 |
| Bob | London (UTC+1) | 10:00–18:00 |
| Carol | Mumbai (UTC+5:30) | 14:30–22:00 |
Process:
- Convert windows to UTC:
Alice: 13:00–21:00 UTC
Bob: 09:00–17:00 UTC
Carol: 09:00–16:30 UTC - Intersection = 13:00–16:30 UTC
- For 1 hour meeting, valid slots: 13:00–14:00, 14:00–15:00, 15:00–16:00
- Display to users:
- Alice: 09:00–10:00, 10:00–11:00, 11:00–12:00 EDT
- Bob: 14:00–15:00, 15:00–16:00, 16:00–17:00 BST
- Carol: 18:30–19:30, 19:30–20:30, 20:30–21:30 IST
Use Cases:
- Global team meetings
- Client calls across time zones
- Webinar scheduling
- Remote interviews across geographies
Best Practices & Tips (Experience Insights)
- Ask participants to restrict availability to working hours to avoid late/early slots
- Use buffer times to allow meeting prep or runover
- Prioritize fairness: if many slots fit, pick times that avoid burdening a single person repeatedly
- For groups > 5, offer poll-based suggestions rather than forcing a single slot
- Always display local times clearly beside UTC slots
- For recurring meetings, account for future DST changes
- Provide export / calendar links (ICS) so users can add slots to their calendars
FAQ
Q: Why do meeting times appear differently for each person?
Because local time zones and DST offsets vary—your planner converts windows to UTC and then back to local times to ensure consistent alignment.
Q: What if there is no overlap window?
Try wider date ranges, shorter meeting durations, or asynchronous options—or consider splitting meeting into segments.
Q: How does daylight saving affect planning?
The tool accounts for DST transitions when converting windows; always specify correct dates so offset shifts are handled.
Q: Can the planner handle date line / overnight windows?
Yes—overnight availabilities (e.g. local 23:00–02:00) are normalized in UTC and considered in intersection logic.
